Ensuring accuracy in 3D-printed jet engine parts

With $750,000 in NASA funding, engineers mitigate and prevent defects in AM metal parts for extreme environments.

University of Arizona researchers Andrew Wessman and Mohammed Shafae received $750,000 in NASA funding to monitor and mitigate defects that occur during additive manufacturing.
Photo credit: University of Arizona College of Engineering

Precision and quality are key in additive manufacturing (AM) when it’s being used to create heat-resistant metal parts for jet engines, rockets, or other high temperature environments. University of Arizona engineers are using machine learning methods and $750,000 in NASA funding to monitor and mitigate defects that occur in AM. Mohammed Shafae and Andrew Wessman are collaborating with Lockheed Martin Space, Open Additive LLC, and CompuTherm LLC.

Different defects, different problems

Two defects occur in AM products:

  • Process defects are physically visible aberrations when something goes wrong during printing. For example, two layers may not stick together properly, or there could be a hole or crack in the material.
  • Material defects are variations in chemistry or the arrangement of atoms not visible without high-resolution microscopes. The complexity of many AM parts can make finding these defects difficult using common inspection methods. If one layer is still cooling, and another hot layer is placed on top of it, the temperature of the first layer could rise and the change in the cooling process might make the part brittle or less able to endure strain.
  •  

    “You can think how dangerous that would be if the part was used in a jet engine or rocket,” Shafae says. “The types of defects we’re focused on are defects that will make the material behave differently than intended.”

    Machine learning is key

    Shafae and Wessman use a sophisticated sensor system, combining thermal imaging and high-speed localized cameras, to monitor the 3D printing process and identify when and where defects occur. They apply machine learning methods to the data and develop a model predicting when defects occur so scientists can take corrective action, preventing the defects or terminating a process before wasting time and materials.

    “We’re trying to learn how these separate categories of defects can be linked to each other, because sometimes process defects can cause material defects,” Shafae says.

    Machine learning (ML) is key: a product is only as strong as its weakest point, and industrial scale AM processes generate several terabytes of data no researcher could sort through. Taking data crunching out of human hands allows for closer analysis of the process.

    Augmented intelligence with the fusion of digital, physical, and biological worlds forms the cornerstone of the University of Arizona’s strategic plan combining data processing, process optimization, materials analysis, and ML.

    “This is truly an example of what people need to be doing to get to Industry 4.0, the use of data to improve processes, and ensure they’re performing as you want,” Wessman says. “By improving manufacturing process quality, you know you have a good product from the time you take it out of the machine.”

    University of Arizona College of Engineering

    January February 2022
    Explore the January February 2022 Issue

    Check out more from this issue and find your next story to read.