Groans over drones

The American Heritage Dictionary defines drone as a pilotless aircraft operated by remote control. However, as you read on, this same word is defined as an idle person who lives off others; a loafer.

Now, I’m not saying that the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is a drone when it comes to lethal drone attacks against terrorists. However, I am questioning their most recent crusade to find out when, where, and against whom drone strikes can be authorized, and how the United States can ensure compliance with international laws relating to the minimization of the loss of innocent lives.

Yes, it’s true, that under the current administration there has been a significant increase in the use of drone strikes, especially in Pakistan. In response to the 9/11 attacks, drones have also been used in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Yemen to battle al-Qaeda and the Taliban. Even though the U.S. Supreme Court has traditionally held that when it comes to matters dealing with foreign affairs, foreign relations, and wars, the commander-in-chief has exclusive domain, the ACLU is asking who or what gives the current administration and the CIA the legal authority to do so.